Lana Clarkson

WARNING: READ THIS BEFORE YOU WATCH THE “PHIL SPECTOR” MOVIE ON HBO

Why David Mamet would write a screenplay about Phil Spector and imply that he might not be guilty of killing Lana Clarkson is a mystery to us and many other people. We’ve never been a fan of Mamet, but this is an insult to the innocent victim and the California justice system – and journalistically unethical. The late Clarkson’s publicist Ed Lozzi has been tirelessly protesting the script and arranged a demonstration at a recent screening of the HBO movie airing Sunday. LA Times reporter Harriet Ryan, who painstakingly covered both of Spector’s murder trials agrees that the script is laughably inaccurate and ignores the facts that got Spector convicted. It actually hints that he didn’t pull the trigger! It’s frightening to think that viewers’ opinions of Spector might soften and they shouldn’t. The fact that Al Pacino is excellent in the role and the movie is top quality otherwise, only makes it worse. Click HERE to read Ryan’s story BEFORE you see the movie.

PHIL SPECTOR WAS EVEN WORSE THAN YOU THOUGHT

Our insightful colleague, Linda Stasi, the TV critic at the NY Post, brought a fascinating investigation to our attention. On Thursday night the Discovery channel show “True Crime with Aphrodite Jones” is all about Phil Spector, who is currently incarcerated for killing Lana Clarkson. As Linda says, “to know him is to hate him.” Footage of Spector’s police interrogation on the night Lana Clarkson was killed is appalling – he’s irate because Lana, a girl he just met, “blew her head open at his castle” and left him accused of murder. There’s also some revealing footage of Spector taken by his former assistant in which he says “What was her motive for taking her own life? I don’t know and I really don’t care!” The show also reveals that Spector got a facelift between his two trials. This should be gratifying viewing for anyone who was happy to see Spector locked up.