Lately the amply proportioned Kardashians have been frequently flaunting the trendy color nude, but they’re doing it all wrong. They wear the color in garments far too tight and sometimes without underwear. If Kim and Khloe DO wear undergarments, they serve to push up all their flesh into the low cut bustline. And you can IMAGINE what the rear view looks like. Pictured here is model Gigi Hadid scurrying to a NY meeting in a fetching flesh colored dress and heels to match. She gives the color class instead of vulgarity.
Photo Credit: AKM-GSI
About The Author
You are wrong. The fabric is so flimsy that you can see the padding in her bra.
They are all fame whores. There is nothing “classy” about this outfit. Gigi is enjoying her 15 min. of fame, but it will pass the moment she gains weight.
The dress is cut up on one side all the way to her waist, not sure I would call that classy
since when is two protruding kidneys attractive?
nude is a noun or adjective but it sure as hell ain’t no ‘color’……unflattering on anyone who wears this non color.
Fat shame
look twice……….THERE IS A BRA.
Nothing classy about JCH new friend Gigi!
At first glance I thought you were right Janet but the more one studies the outfit, well I agree with the PP’s.
The color however does look flattering on Ms. Hadid.
@miumiu–News flash! Your kidneys are NOT on the front of your body!
Totally agree!!!
Ugly dress. It’s too clingy. Horrible material.