HEY KIM AND KHLOE KARDASHIAN: THIS IS HOW THE COLOR NUDE SHOULD BE WORN!
Lately the amply proportioned Kardashians have been frequently flaunting the trendy color nude, but they’re doing it all wrong. They wear the color in garments far too tight and sometimes without underwear. If Kim and Khloe DO wear undergarments, they serve to push up all their flesh into the low cut bustline. And you can IMAGINE what the rear view looks like. Pictured here is model Gigi Hadid scurrying to a NY meeting in a fetching flesh colored dress and heels to match. She gives the color class instead of vulgarity.
Photo Credit: AKM-GSI
Monday, May 9, 2016
Festus
Ugly dress. It’s too clingy. Horrible material.
JD
Totally agree!!!
Miss Eva
@miumiu–News flash! Your kidneys are NOT on the front of your body!
susieserb
At first glance I thought you were right Janet but the more one studies the outfit, well I agree with the PP’s.
The color however does look flattering on Ms. Hadid.
Strom
Nothing classy about JCH new friend Gigi!
batman
look twice……….THERE IS A BRA.
Gladys Kravitz
Fat shame
1st Round 1st Minute
nude is a noun or adjective but it sure as hell ain’t no ‘color’……unflattering on anyone who wears this non color.
miumiu
since when is two protruding kidneys attractive?
Palermo
The dress is cut up on one side all the way to her waist, not sure I would call that classy
kait
They are all fame whores. There is nothing “classy” about this outfit. Gigi is enjoying her 15 min. of fame, but it will pass the moment she gains weight.
CoCo
You are wrong. The fabric is so flimsy that you can see the padding in her bra.