#britneyspears #janetcharlton
It makes no sense. This is one of the photos of Britney Spears in Lucky magazine that caused such an uproar among fans who resented the heavy photo-shopping and obvious wig. There were no complaints from Britney – because she has never looked better. (At least not in the last eight years.) Sure, the wig looks “wiggy,” but we bet Britney took it home and plans to wear it on The X-Factor. For some reason, Britney hasn’t found a hairdresser able to conquer her frazzled locks. Her own hair looks perpetually damaged and her extensions usually look fake. Maintaining her looks has never been high on Britney’s priority list. We think Lucky magazine did her a favor.
About The Author
Not sure why fans would be in an uproar. Photoshopping beyond recognition is par for the course on magazine covers. And I agree that wig looks better than the roadkill she usually wears for hair.
I agree with bunny. She looks healthier than she has in years.
bunni: LOL
I’ve seen photos of her with her hair pulled back in a pony tail and you could see where the extensions were fastened on, or however the heck they are applied. I have a cousin hairdresser and she said constant use of extensions and/or clip ons damage the hair.
She looks heavily medicated.
Every cover of every magazine is photoshopped all to hell. What’s the difference.
Photoshopping is causing people to feel awful about themselves. I want a revolt against it! That looks more like a doll than a human.
The only thing for me is that the low hairline changes the look of her face drastically. She looks like someone else.
…………I DIDN’T SAY A WORD YET!!
Is this one of Kim Zolciac’s wigs?
I think she looks adorable . She looks happier and healthy . After all she has been through , people should just be kind .
You think Im weird dontcha